Students in Reinventing the News this week are evaluating four nonpartisan political Web sites — FactCheck.org, PolitiFact.com, the Washington Post’s Congress Votes Database and Project Vote Smart. Here’s what they’re saying about them.
Why can’t users post comments on any of these sites? That is a key component of Web journalism, and Adrianne Loggins thinks commenting ought to be incorporated into these sites as well.
PolitiFact is the most interesting of the four, says Belen Bogado, because of the way it combines serious political information with an entertaining presentation.
Is there a trend emerging here? Bobby Feingold, too, is a PolitiFact fan, writing that its initially convoluted appearance masks an entertaining approach to politics.
There’s value in all four sites, says Candice Novak. But she points to some other worthwhile sites that track the role of money in politics.
Chaz Miller also has nice things to say about the four sites, but he seems to be the most impressed with the Congress Votes Database, despite what he calls its lack of aesthetic appeal.
Since both major-party presidential candidates are senators, Drew Bonifant points out that the Congress Votes Database ought to be a useful tool in analyzing their backgrounds.
What the political-database sites lack in context and analysis, writes Firuzeh Shokooh-Valle, they make up for in sheer democracy-enhancing information — and thus serve the basic roles of good journalism.
Does Sarah Palin hate puppies? That’s what Jared Molton concludes after reading a FactCheck analysis of an ad criticizing Palin for shooting wolves from airplanes.
U.S. Sen. John Kerry’s astrological sign (Sagittarius) is just one of the facts Jess Volpe gleaned at Project Vote Smart, her favorite of the four political sites.
Julie Balise pleads guilty to enjoying PolitiFact, but wishes that its content didn’t look like advertisements and its advertisements didn’t look like content.
Political databases have their place, writes Liz Stitt. But she adds that there are plenty of other worthwhile political resources on the Web — including a video of David Letterman mocking John McCain for canceling his appearance this week.
Like many students, Mark Rizzo finds PolitiFact and FactCheck to be similar — and PolitiFact better. Among other things, he notes, PolitiFact simply covers more content.
PolitiFact has a technological edge over FactCheck as well, says Matt Collette — FactCheck makes you download videos before you can watch them, whereas PolitiFact uses Flash.
“Somewhere, Mitt Romney is crying,” writes Michaela Stanelun. Why? Because PolitiFact has unveiled a new feature called the “Flip-O-Meter,” which seems somehow appropriate for the former presidential candidate.